Across the world, citizens are told that “Net Zero” is an act of moral urgency — a noble crusade to save the planet. But behind the language of sacrifice, a very different story has unfolded. It is a story of power, profit, and control ,where climate policy has been engineered around a single unit of measurement that hands leverage to a small circle of powerful institutions, investors, and corporate giants.That unit is “carbon.”And carbon has quietly become a global currency.
1. The Birth of the Carbon Currency
In the late 1980s, a cluster of scientific and diplomatic bodies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) ,made a crucial decision.
Instead of grappling with the complexity of real-world energy systems, biodiversity, and climate variability, they opted to boil everything down to a single metric:
Carbon dioxide and its equivalents (CO₂e).This simplification made international treaties manageable. But it also created something far more potent: a uniform, tradeable, and enforceable measure that could underpin an entire new financial ecosystem.Once carbon was defined as the universal unit, the architecture of global climate governance took shape:
The Kyoto Protocol (1997) established carbon targets and trading mechanisms.
The Paris Agreement (2015) locked in national commitments.Carbon markets and emissions trading systems followed, enabling governments and companies to buy and sell “pollution rights.”In effect, carbon became a political commodity ,not just a scientific measure.
2. From Treaty to Technocracy
Once treaties were in place, national democracies were no longer fully in charge of their energy and industrial strategy.
The process works like this:
1. International bodies like the UNFCCC and IPCC set global goals.
2. Forums such as the World Economic Forum promote aligned investment and policy models.
3. Supranational regulators like the European Commission enforce rules through emissions trading and green finance regulations.
4. Domestic quangos such as the Climate Change Committee (CCC) in the UK translate those goals into legally binding carbon budgets.The crucial point?
These decisions bypass direct democratic consent. Voters can elect governments, but those governments are legally bound to meet pre-set targets ,or face legal and financial consequences.
3. The Financialisation of the Climate Agenda
A global carbon metric made it possible to monetise climate policy at scale.
The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) generated tens of billions of euros annually in carbon allowance auctions in 2023 alone.
Worldwide, carbon pricing revenues have climbed to record levels, reaching well over $100 billion per year.Carbon offsets and credits are now traded much like commodities, allowing companies to claim “Net Zero” without actually cutting emissions.
This isn’t small change.It is one of the largest new financial markets ever constructed.
A market created by political decision, not natural demand.The beneficiaries are rarely small farmers or working families.
They are:
Large multinational energy firms with subsidy leverage.Investment funds managing billions in “green assets.”Governments and agencies that collect carbon auction revenues and redistribute them through opaque channels.
4. The Al Gore Moment
This architecture might have remained largely hidden from the public if not for a few charismatic figures.
One of the most influential was Al Gore.
As U.S. Vice President in the 1990s, Gore championed the Kyoto Protocol and helped establish carbon trading mechanisms. After leaving office, he co-founded Generation Investment Management, a sustainable investment firm that now channels vast sums into “climate-aligned” finance.
He later became a global celebrity through the documentary An Inconvenient Truth, which emotionally embedded the carbon narrative in popular culture.Whether one admires or criticises Gore, the fact remains: he and many others built lucrative careers and investment empires on the very system they promoted politically.
5. Emergency Narratives and Policy Bypass
A constant stream of “climate emergency” declarations has allowed governments and supranational bodies to short-circuit debate.
Planning rules are weakened for projects labelled “Net Zero.”Infrastructure such as solar megafarms, wind installations, and BESS hubs often overrides local opposition.
Citizens questioning the system are frequently dismissed as “deniers” or “extremists” rather than engaged with on evidence.This isn’t environmental stewardship.It’s policy by decree, justified through fear.
6. Control at the Personal Level
The logical endgame of carbon accounting is personal carbon control.
Pilot schemes already exist for:
Individual carbon footprint tracking in banking apps.Carbon border taxes on goods and travel.
Digital IDs linked to emissions reporting.
Discussions about personal carbon budgets.In such a world, your freedom to travel, heat your home, or buy certain goods could eventually be constrained not by law debated in Parliament, but by algorithmic carbon rationing linked to Net Zero targets.
7. Who Wins and Who Loses
Winners:
Investment funds and multinationals positioned to exploit subsidies and carbon markets.
Political elites and international institutions gaining leverage through climate treaties.NGOs and consultancies funded through the climate-finance ecosystem.
Losers:
Households facing rising energy costs, mandatory green levies, and restricted choices.
Farmers and rural communities whose land is taken for solar, wind, or offset projects.
Small businesses forced to comply with rules they had no say in writing.Developing nations coerced into compliance through climate finance conditions.The language may be “green,” but the mechanics are extractive.
8. Why It’s Ideological
This entire system is built not on a neutral reading of science, but on a political and economic ideology:
That centralised global governance is necessary to “save the planet.”That carbon accounting can replace democratic debate.That private finance is the best delivery vehicle for public goods.That sacrifices by ordinary people are acceptable collateral.
This ideology rewards compliance with the carbon narrative, while marginalising practical solutions that don’t serve the financial model ,such as domestic nuclear power, rooftop solar films, or grid-first investment strategies.
9. A Democratic Response Is Possible
Critiquing this system isn’t about denying that environmental issues exist.
It’s about rejecting the concentration of power and profit in the hands of unelected institutions and financial elites.
A democratic, practical energy strategy could look very different:
Reclaim national control over energy policy from international quangos.
Invest in stable, dispatchable generation such as SMRs and domestic gas.
Prioritise rooftop and community solar rather than vast land grabs.
Demand transparency over who profits from carbon markets and subsidies.Make environmental policy accountable to elected legislatures, not supranational deals.This isn’t “anti-green.”It’s pro-sovereignty, pro-democracy, and pro-honesty.
10. The Real Awakening
The world doesn’t need another unelected climate czar.
It needs citizens who understand how a simple accounting trick “carbon” was turned into a mechanism of global power.
A mechanism that enriches the few at the expense of the many.
That imposes costs without consent.
That dresses control in the language of virtue.
When people understand that, they can challenge it , legally, politically, and publicly.
The carbon empire is not inevitable.It was built by people, and it can be unbuilt by people, too.
✍️ Author’s Note
This piece does not deny the existence of environmental issues. It challenges the political and economic machinery that has grown around them. The use of carbon as a single metric has created an industry that is powerful, profitable, and largely unaccountable.
Democracy does not require blind acceptance of elite narratives. It requires informed citizens willing to ask hard questions, follow the money, and demand that power returns to where it belongs, with the people.
Shane oxer
Campaigner for Fairer and Affordable Energy
SAY NO TO THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR LAND 
Leave a comment